A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such spots are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, where views of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, an image which includes given that turn out to be emblematic of your intensity on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second from the lawful timeline.
On the core with the dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as created, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been performed based on Skilled assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.